Once you have collected, tabulated and displayed your results, you can use them to draw a conclusion. When you are thinking about a conclusion, look right back to the start of your experiment where you were told (or you decided) what you were to investigate.

For example:

• In investigation 1, investigating the effect of temperature on the rate of breakdown of hydrogen peroxide by catalase, your conclusion should provide an answer to this question.

• in investigation 2, investigating the effect of immersion in solutions of different sucrose concentration on the change in length of potato strips, your conclusion should state the relationship between the concentration of sucrose solution and the change in length of the potato strips.

• in investigation 4, testing the hypothesis: the density of stomata on the lower surface of a leaf is greater than the density on the upper surface, your conclusion should say whether your results support or disprove this hypothesis.

For example, imagine you have measured four lengths as 46mm, 53mm, 52mm and 48mm. You are asked to calculate the mean and to show your working. You should write this down properly as:

You've already seen, on

There's another example of showing your working on

For example:

• in investigation 2, investigating the effect of immersion in solutions of different sucrose concentration on the change in length of potato strips, your conclusion should state the relationship between the concentration of sucrose solution and the change in length of the potato strips.

• in investigation 4, testing the hypothesis: the density of stomata on the lower surface of a leaf is greater than the density on the upper surface, your conclusion should say whether your results support or disprove this hypothesis.

**Explaining your reasoning****There will often be marks for explaining how you have reached your conclusion. Your reasoning should refer clearly to your results. For example, your conclusion to investigation 2 (whose results are shown in the table below) might be:**

A sucrose solution with a concentrations of 0.6 moldm

^{-3}and below caused an increase in length of the potato strips. A sucrose solution with a concentration of 0.8 moldm^{-3 }and above caused a decrease in length of the potato strips. From the graph, the solution that I would expect to cause no change in length of the strips would be 0.62 moldm^{-3}.
The strips gained in length because they took up water, which was because the water potential of the sucrose solution was greater than the water potential in the potato cells. This therefore means that the water potential inside the potato cells was the same as the water potential of a 0.62 moldm

^{-3}sucrose solution.**Showing your working, and significant figures****You may be asked to carry out a calculation and to show your working. There will be marks for doing this. If you do not show your working clearly, then you wiil not get full marks, even if your answer is absolutely correct.**

For example, imagine you have measured four lengths as 46mm, 53mm, 52mm and 48mm. You are asked to calculate the mean and to show your working. You should write this down properly as:

You've already seen, on

**the post #70**, that the final answer to a calculation should have the same number of significant figures as the original numbers you were working from. If you do the calculation above, you'll find the answer you get is 49.75. But the original measurements were only to two significant figures (a whole number of mm) so that is how you should give the final answer to your calculation. You must round the answer up or down to give the same number of significant figures as the original values from which you are working.There's another example of showing your working on

**this post. (page 119)**
## No comments:

## Post a Comment